HAHA Sorry! I guess I hit the send button to early.
Well, something is not being added correctly is my guess, I know for a fact
I compiled this with the same arguments. :) And I also remember getting
that error, thus it being excluded.
Do a system out in or breakpoint and make sure the exclude is going to;
public void addExclude(String className, String name) line
194:ExternCConfiguration.
If it's getting added then it's something REALLY stupid happening. :)
Mike
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> > The error is right here; the return type "jQuery.callbacks"
> >
> > public static function Callbacks(flags:String = null):jQuery.callbacks {
> > return null; }
>
> yeah, I've seen that but I excluded it in my config.xml
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>Callbacks</name></exclude>
>
> So, why is it in jQuery.as ?
>
> > Just for sake of consistency, you might want to rename;
> >
> > <classToFunction>
> >
> > to
> >
> > <class-to-function>
>
> Done
>
> > You are using jquery-1.9.js right?
>
> Yes
>
> > That should be excluded with;
>
> ??
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:56:13 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we
> now have 1.9 in AS
> > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > The error is right here; the return type "jQuery.callbacks"
> >
> > public static function Callbacks(flags:String = null):jQuery.callbacks {
> > return null; }
> >
> > Just for sake of consistency, you might want to rename;
> >
> > <classToFunction>
> >
> > to
> >
> > <class-to-function>
> >
> > You are using jquery-1.9.js right?
> >
> > That should be excluded with;
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <
> webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm looking for a while why I've got this king of errors for a while
> now,
> >> any clue ?
> >>
> >> U:\sources\asf\flex\falcon\externs\jquery\out\as\classes\jQuery.as:210
> >> Erreur interne : java.lang.NullPointerException
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.TypeScope.getPropertyForMemberAccess(TypeScope.java:344)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ScopeView.getPropertyForMemberAccess(ScopeView.java:81)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:879)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:841)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.scopes.ASScope.getPropertyFromDef(ASScope.java:760)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.resolveMemberRef(IdentifierNode.java:829)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.resolve(IdentifierNode.java:377)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.IdentifierNode.getMName(IdentifierNode.java:432)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.tree.as.MemberAccessExpressionNode.getMName(MemberAccessExpressionNode.java:158)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGeneratingReducer.dottedName(ABCGeneratingReducer.java:840)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.action_321(CmcEmitter.java:5236)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.dispatchAction(CmcEmitter.java:8487)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduceAntecedent(CmcEmitter.java:39127)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.dispatchAction(CmcEmitter.java:6881)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduceAntecedent(CmcEmitter.java:39127)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.dispatchAction(CmcEmitter.java:9434)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduceAntecedent(CmcEmitter.java:39127)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduce(CmcEmitter.java:39104)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduceSubgoals(CmcEmitter.java:39146)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduceAntecedent(CmcEmitter.java:39126)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.reduce(CmcEmitter.java:39104)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.CmcEmitter.burm(CmcEmitter.java:39406)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGenerator.generateInstructions(ABCGenerator.java:228)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGenerator.generateMethodBodyForFunction(ABCGenerator.java:393)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGenerator.generateMethodBodyForFunction(ABCGenerator.java:347)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGenerator.generateFunction(ABCGenerator.java:262)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ClassDirectiveProcessor.declareFunction(ClassDirectiveProcessor.java:787)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.processNode(DirectiveProcessor.java:214)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.traverse(DirectiveProcessor.java:188)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.GlobalDirectiveProcessor.declareClass(GlobalDirectiveProcessor.java:423)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.processNode(DirectiveProcessor.java:206)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.traverse(DirectiveProcessor.java:188)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.GlobalDirectiveProcessor.declarePackage(GlobalDirectiveProcessor.java:449)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.processNode(DirectiveProcessor.java:223)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.DirectiveProcessor.traverse(DirectiveProcessor.java:188)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.as.codegen.ABCGenerator.generate(ABCGenerator.java:122)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.ASCompilationUnit.handleABCBytesRequest(ASCompilationUnit.java:477)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.CompilationUnitBase.processABCBytesRequest(CompilationUnitBase.java:866)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.CompilationUnitBase.access$300(CompilationUnitBase.java:107)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.CompilationUnitBase$4$1.call(CompilationUnitBase.java:309)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.CompilationUnitBase$4$1.call(CompilationUnitBase.java:305)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.requests.RequestMaker$1.call(RequestMaker.java:228)
> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.units.requests.RequestMaker$1.call(RequestMaker.java:222)
> >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> >> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> >> at
> >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> >> at
> >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> >>
> >> public static function Callbacks(flags:String = null):jQuery.callbacks
> >> { return null; }
> >> ^
> >>
> >> This is my jquery-config-xml:
> >>
> >> <flex-config>
> >>
> >> <compiler>
> >> <accessible>true</accessible>
> >>
> >> <locale/>
> >>
> >> <source-path>
> >> <path-element>src</path-element>
> >> </source-path>
> >>
> >> <warn-no-constructor>false</warn-no-constructor>
> >> </compiler>
> >>
> >> <external>
> >> <path-element>externs/jquery-1.9.js</path-element>
> >> </external>
> >>
> >> <as-root>out/as</as-root>
> >>
> >>
> >> <classToFunction>$</classToFunction>
> >>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>is</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>promise</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>getJSON</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>ajax</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>when</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>post</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>getScript</name></exclude>
> >> <exclude><class>jQuery</class><name>Callbacks</name></exclude>
> >>
> >> <class-exclude><class>Deferred</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>jQuery.deferred</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>jQuery.Event</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>jQuery.Deferred</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>$.Event</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>$.Deferred</class></class-exclude>
> >> <class-exclude><class>$.deferred</class></class-exclude>
> >>
> >> </flex-config>
> >>
> >>
> >> I had to create:
> >>
> >> @Config(allowMultiple = true)
> >> @Mapping("classToFunction")
> >> @InfiniteArguments
> >> public void setClassToFunctions(ConfigurationValue cfgval,
> >> List<String> values)
> >> {
> >> for (String val : values)
> >> addClassToFunction(val);
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >>> From: aha...@adobe.com
> >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but
> we
> >> now have 1.9 in AS
> >>> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:52:00 +0000
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 6/20/15, 8:38 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>What happens if you try to compile an external that does this that is
> not
> >>>>part of the JS.swc build? Well for one, it won't be added because the
> >>>>Window class is already compiled into the JS.swc.
> >>>>
> >>>>So for now, it's important that we add all externs to JS.swc that mixin
> >> to
> >>>>the HTML DOM classes.
> >>>>
> >>>>Good frameworks I would think don't do this? It's just their API and
> that
> >>>>is all.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, I’ll get a lot of frameworks hack the built-in prototypes. We’re
> >>> doing that in the UI frameworks for FlexJS. First of all, it is
> possible,
> >>> second, there are only so many ways to associate the actual HTML
> elements
> >>> with the actual classes you want to present.
> >>>
> >>> So maybe, instead of having a stack of SWCs where Jquery.swc depend on
> >>> js.swc, the Jquery.swc will be all-inclusive and not depend on js.swc
> >>> because it will have its own copies of the classes that are in js.swc
> in
> >>> it with the modifications that JQuery applies.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
