I’m not sure if you were talking about the same thing, but this is the 
discussion I was thinking of:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flex-dev/201511.mbox/browser

On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Would be interested in a pointer to that discussion ... cause the only 
> benefit of leaving them away is that it makes less fuss in writing the files, 
> but on the downside there is a large amount of downsides:
> - No tool support (IntelliJ can't help you detect things that are wrong)
> - Makes writing parsers harder (I'm currently starting to work on automated 
> config generation ... that's difficult if there's no schema)
> - I don't know which options there are ... all I have are examples that I 
> have to extract what they mean.
> 
> Chris
> 
> ________________________________________
> Von: Harbs <[email protected]>
> Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 15:07
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [FlexJS] No Namespaces?
> 
> There was discussion on the topic in the past. IIRC, it was a conscious 
> decision to not use namespaces. I don’t remember the reason.
> 
> Harbs
> 
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> I'm currently working on migrating the build of the framework projects in 
>> the flex-asjs project to build with the flexjs-maven-plugin. I noticed one 
>> thing, that most of our config files don't have a single namespace 
>> declaration. Is this just because of lazyness, or don't we have schemas for 
>> them? I'm currently talking about the compile-config xml files and the 
>> manifest files ...
>> 
>> 
>> Chris
> 

Reply via email to