Hi Alex,

sure ... push and give me a short notice, that you did and I'll take over from 
there.

Well I am a little worried, that they won't adjust the Maven build and continue 
working with Ant. 
Sounds like patch files would also be an option. I would have to implement a 
mojo (goal of a maven-plugin) for that, but that shouldn't be a big problem. It 
should be a lot easier to maintain, cause the replacements of the Ant sometimes 
were operating on things changed a few steps earlier, that's why I re-created 
new ones that should do the same, but a lot simpler.

Also I'll think of a way to deal with multiple downloads, but I guess just two 
executions of the download goal should be enough. But I'll look into that as 
soon as you have pushed the stuff.

But I definitely +1 for a diff/patch approach.

Chris




________________________________________
Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. April 2016 00:40
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FALCONJX] Merging Maven refactor in to develop branch

On 4/25/16, 2:49 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>I'll have a look at this tomorrow.

Are you ok if I push the merge and potentially break the Maven build?


>
>But I really hope that we can keep things stable for at least a few days
>from now on.

I think once the merge is pushed, folks needing to change the externs will
modify the right files and the build will continue working.  My only
concern was about how the replace task now has a Maven version and an Ant
version.  I want to synch them up in a way that is easier for others to
produce.  I posted earlier about just going to patch files instead of
regex.  Or maybe we should make forks of these external code bases and
apply the changes we want.

Thoughts?
-Alex


Reply via email to