I thought I fixed this. Is it not working?
Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
------ Original message------
From: Harbs
Date: Sat, May 14, 2016 11:53 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org;
Subject:Re: [FlexJS][XML]appending XMLLists
Alex,
Can you look at this?
On May 12, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I committed my changes, but I need you to look at it.
>
> I commented out the test to get it to compile, but besides that, there’s
> definitely a problem:
>
> 198: ERROR - Parse error. invalid assignment target
> [java] this.xml2.child('a') = this.xml2.child('a').plus(new XML( '<a
> id="456"/>'));
>
>
> The original code is the following:
> xml2.a += <a id="456"/>;
>
> I’m not sure how to best handle this.
>
> There are two cases we need to deal with:
> 1. Variable assignment.
> 2. XML children assignment.
>
> Case 1 should simply be foo = foo.plus(bar);
>
> However, case 2 cannot become xml.child(foo) = ...
>
> It could wrap the whole thing in a setChild() call, but that gets kind of
> complicated. Not sure of any other way, though...
>
> Additionally, my changes are working at all in the simple case of:
> list1 += list4
> which still becomes:
> list1.concat(list4);
>
> A simple “+” is even worse:
> var fud:XMLList = list1 + list4;
> becomes:
> var /** @type {XMLList} */ fud = list1 + list4;
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> On May 12, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well I tried this, but something is wrong.
>>
>> I changed the tests to reflect my changes and I’m getting an error in the
>> tests (in TestFlexJSGlobalClasses). How can I see the results of the test to
>> see what’s wrong?
>>
>> On May 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/10/16, 8:03 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> foo = foo.plus(bar);
>>>
>>> OK, well in theory the compiler generated "foo" and is about to add
>>> ".concat(" so you would get "foo.concat(" then "bar" would get emitted.
>>> Try replacing ".concat" with:
>>>
>>> " = "
>>> getWalker().walk(node.getLeftOperandNode()); // should re-output "foo"
>>> "; "
>>> getWalker().walk(node.getLeftOperandNode()); // should re-output "foo"
>>> ".plus("
>>>
>>>
>>> Or something like that. If that doesn't work I will try to look at it
>>> later today.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>
