Hi Alex, Well in this case I don't see the components listed in the catalog.xml of the resulting swc, which it needs to in order to work without a dedicated manifest file. Or is this different when using Ant?
Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2016 22:41 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [FLEXJS] Strange Flat manifest On 5/19/16, 8:47 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >well I set the priorities differently ... so currently you would vote >for code duplication and I would vote for subclassing. We shouldn't >just continue that path but should decide as a project. If the project >votes for code duplication I will try to adjust, but I wouldn't simply >go that path just because you on your own think it's the way to go. > >You might get a teenieweenie bit of performance, but maintenance is a >nightmare as you have to post every minor change to every component >"Copy-Paste-Derived" from that. Maybe we have different definitions of "duplication". When a SWC like JQuery.swc wants to use the Label from HTML.swc it doesn't subclass Label or copy/paste code, it simply uses a manifest.xml to map the HTML.swc's Label to its own URI. I don't see any maintenance issues with doing that, but I could be missing something. > >In general we should discuss design decisions a little more an not just >implement what we think is best ... that's ok for a POC but not the way >we should do in general. This "decision" was made during the POC phase. The same technique is used in the regular Flex SDK so s:ArrayList maps to mx:ArrayList. It isn't anything new. -Alex
