Kessler CTR Mark J wrote > Should not use flash in the name. The main SDK can target flash player, > air, and native apps (with captive runtime).
Hmm, I thought that all these runtimes are under the same hood wich is called "Flash platform" by Adobe. Seems that the Adobe naming confused me also ;-) Kessler CTR Mark J wrote > Then there is FlexJS which is divergent from the main SDK. So I think > Apache Flex as a title would do just fine. Ok, but that means that both SDKs exists side by side: ->Apache Flex ->Apache FlexJS But my understanding is that FlexJS is under the hood of Apache Flex: ->Apache Flex -->FlexJS -->Previous Flex So if you'd like to make sure that there will be no confusion if you talk or write just about "Apache Flex" you have to mention that you mean the "AIR, Flash,... whatever SDK". Probably at the end this discussion is useless but maybe a unique name would avoid confusion, especially if FlexJS gets more and more popular and moves into the focus of non-Flex developers. Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54911.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
