Hi Chris, I tried your suggestion and changed the image extension to "jpg" to be closer in my example, but after building I didn't find in target folder. This should be in "target"? or maybe in a subfolder (target/main/resourcers)?
2016-11-04 10:29 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>: > Hi Carlos, > > just to be complete with my suggestion. Maven style would be to have > sources, which are compiled in „src/main/flex“ and resources which are > simply copied to the output in „src/main/resources“ > > Chris > > Am 04.11.16, 10:13 schrieb "[email protected] im Auftrag von Carlos > Rovira" <[email protected] im Auftrag von > [email protected]>: > > I think Chris is on the track on this issue. > > As a user, If I have a resource on a folder, is because I want it on > final > output, so I'll expect to be copied, since output folder is what I'll > be > putting on server (and not any source code related resource). > > btw, I think this should be IDE agnostic, and it scares me if we think > it > should depend on that. people should be able to use it from command > line, > so I think this is in the flexjs sdk domain. > > In traditional flex development: > > * I used a path like this "/assets/image.jpg" and that would work as > an > absolute path. > * The other way is relative to the resource, without the first slash, > and > you can up and down the hierarchy starting from the source file in > which > you write that code. > > I use a maven style folder structure (so src/main/flex/App.mxml and so > on), > other will use src/App.mxml... we need to support all of this in a easy > way, since this is basic. > > I think If users start to be kept in this basic things, is what could > make > them to not continue trying flexjs. > > > > > > > > > > 2016-11-04 8:04 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>: > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > I’m glad you are having this problem ☺ ... don’t get me wrong, but it > > points out a problem I noticed when working on cleaning up the > > MXMLFlexJSPublisher. > > The problem is that only png, gif, jpg and json resources are > copied. This > > is hard coded and I don’t like that approach. I would prefer > something more > > Maven style in which you have sources and resources. > > This way everything in the resources could be copied instead of this > hack > > with hard-coded filters. A short fix would be to name your image > „jpg“ > > instead of „jpeg“. > > > > The second thing is the „relativity to the main class“. It seems all > > resources are addressed relative to the main class: > > > > File imageSrcDir = new File(configuration.getTargetFile()). > > getAbsoluteFile().getParentFile(); > > > > This sort of works as long as the Main class is in the root of the > > project. This restriction however only seems to apply if you are > using > > Flash Builder. In my IntelliJ and Maven applications I usually put > my Main > > classes in packages. > > > > You can have a look at the code I’m talking about in > MXMLFlexJSPublisher > > (Lines 177-201 in my closure-classpath-sources branch or > 149-152,407-421 in > > the develop branch) > > > > Chris > > > > > > Am 03.11.16, 23:10 schrieb "[email protected] im Auftrag von > Carlos > > Rovira" <[email protected] im Auftrag von > [email protected]>: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I'm trying to test a simple <js:Image> in MDLExample without > luck, > > something like: > > > > <js:Image url="main/resources/Unknown.jpeg" width="220" > height="140"/> > > > > is not working. > > > > I think the problem is maven is not copying the image asset to to > > target > > folder. > > > > I get it working with something like this: > > > > <js:Image url="../../../../src/main/resources/Unknown.jpeg" > > width="220" > > height="140"/> > > > > (reaching it from outside target and from the source project) > > > > Maybe I'm doing something wrong? > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > Director General > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.avant2.es > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede > contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje > por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma > vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le > comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es > CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a > nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.avant2.es Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
