HI Alex,
2017-01-31 18:41 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>: > OK, I have something working. It is in the "dual" branch I just pushed. > great :) > But there is a catch: MXMLJSC requires Java 7 or greater and Flash > Builder is packaged with Java 6. So, in order to use this capability from > FB, you will need to upgrade FB to use Java 7 as in this post [1]. So > that's the first question: Would we want to require folks to upgrade FB > to Java 7? I don't think we can script the upgrade to automate it for > people as there are permissions issues in the process. But currently, I > think it is worth it, since that means you don't have to use separate > launch scripts to run the JS compile, although I think it is possible to > have a way to fall back to the current mechanism of SWF-only compilation > and use the separate launch script if folks can't upgrade. > > IMHO, for FlexJS that is new tech we should not be looking at FB anymore. I understand it for old Flex SDK, legacy SDK goes with legacy IDE....is right for me But considering FlexJS, please we should concentrate on newer options begin developed with FlexJS... So that's question #2: Can I start replacing HTML with Basic? > > I think yes, and I want to suggest something here. I created some basic HTML tags (span, a, div, h1,...) I think we should separate that tags for normal SDK components like js:Container, js:Button... those tags are the most basic structures, and FlexJS component is somewhat the immediate next level. In cases like MDL, I could depend it only from basic tags and not from FlexJS component. Both avoiding actual confusion of user trying to use both a the time and better structuring and removing things People will Neve use (or should never use). And if they want it...PAYG and introduce it in your build and your code. Makes that sense? > question #3: Any objections to moving from one SWC per library to two? > > It seems ok to me at all. And this should remove weight as well removing dependencies that are not used never in the end > Any objections to supporting "AUTO" as a special value? > > Here can't help since don't know exactly what's what Fred did Thanks! Carlos -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
