On 2/2/17, 10:59 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >I was going to suggest something down the path of: creating the primary >artifact which contains library.swf and library-is.swf. We could use >these in Ant, Maven and newer IDEs and additionally continue to produce a >separate js-swc (as we are doing now) which only legacy IDEs need to use. >The additional library-js.swf shouldn't confuse the old IDEs, am I >correct? > >Would that be a compromise? We can pack extra stuff in the main SWCs. It will slow down the build a bit. The main questions are: who will do the work and how important is it? -Alex
