Here’s one of them:
static private const anyPrintChar:RegExp = /[^\u0009\u000a\u000d\u0020]/g;
outputs:
org.apache.flex.textLayout.elements.SpanElement.anyPrintChar = /[^
]/g;
> On Mar 9, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. These are from TLF. The strings are evaluated by Java. There’s no error
> except on the Javascript side because the string literals become non-sensical.
>
> We had a similar issue when porting our app. I think we used
> String.fromCharCode() to get around the problem there.
>
> Basically, we need some way to tell the compiler that any strings used in
> RegExp objects should come through bit-for-bit identical and not be evaluated
> as Strings. I have no idea what’s involved in doing that in Java...
>
>> On Mar 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Are these from TLF? What error are you getting? Falcon compiles TLF as
>> part of the integration tests. Is it the JS output that is broken?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 3/9/17, 1:18 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve come across quite a few regex patterns which break compilation.
>>> Here’s some examples:
>>>
>>> private static const _newLineTabPattern:RegExp = /[\u0009\u000a\u000d]/g;
>>> static private const brRegEx:RegExp = /\u2028/;
>>> private static const _newLineRegex:RegExp = /\u000A|\u000D\u000A?/g;
>>> public static const anyPrintChar:RegExp = /[^\u0009\u000a\u000d\u0020]/g;
>>> public static const attrRegex:RegExp =
>>> /\s+(\w+)(?:\s*=\s*(".*?"|'.*?'|[\w\.]+))?/sg;
>>> public static const tagRegex:RegExp =
>>> /<(\/?)(\w+)((?:\s+\w+(?:\s*=\s*(?:".*?"|'.*?'|[\w\.]+))?)*)\s*(\/?)>/sg;
>>> public static const stripRegex:RegExp =
>>> /<!--.*?-->|<\?(".*?"|'.*?'|[^>"']+)*>|<!(".*?"|'.*?'|[^>"']+)*>/sg;
>>>
>>> The last three have to do with unsupported flags, but the first four
>>> break simply because the compiler evaluates the strings and they become
>>> spaces and line breaks, etc.
>>>
>>> What can we do to prevent the compiler from killing patterns during
>>> compilation?
>>>
>>> Harbs
>>
>
