Well done, Chris! (Well, maybe not the part where you said Flash is dead ;-)). But I think you did better than I would in those conditions.
Anyway, who do we currently know is going to the FlexJS Summit? Thanks, -Alex On 4/18/17, 4:00 AM, "yishayw" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Nice interview, I'm sure it made some listeners curious about the summit. > >I thought there was potential for confusion when you compared the move to >FlexJS to the move from Flex 3 to Flex 4. Flex 4 was backwards compatible >with Flex 3 and feature rich. I think we need to be careful that listeners >don't expect to see a feature rich FlexJS 1.0 that's compatible with Flex >4. > >Other than that I thought you did a good job in putting things in a clear >context. Should also help me with my introduction talk. > > > >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2FInterview-on-the-FlexJS-Summit-tp611 >85p61187.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3f3de213fa1342974c0b08d4864b8dbd%7Cfa7b1b5 >a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636281106441317612&sdata=gVuTDgv5eXb7% >2F1SqAUZZBKxN8e3WjYyk0wCF2Cc9E2E%3D&reserved=0 >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
