On 4/23/17, 9:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> The patch file issue was resolved. The externs are not derivative >>works. > >How was it resolved? From what I can see there’s wasn't confirmation on >legal discuss. Do any other PMC members think we need to get confirmation from legal discuss? Seems like it would be strange to ask non-laywers if the agree on the opinion of a practicing lawyer. > >> The MIT license changes you want to make are not "must do". Just >> something you want to do. Now would be a good time to do them. > >They are required in order to comply with the terms of the MIT license. >Releases need to comply with ASF policy on licensing. [1] I’ll go ahead >and make the change(s) later today. The changes you are making are a workaround, and the discussion on legal-discuss did not mandate it. The original code still won't comply until the original community to accept changes. Thanks, -Alex
