On 4/25/17, 7:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> Justin, which file(s) are you talking about? What is the problem and >>what >> is your proposed solution? > > >The problem IMO is two fold in we’re a) not following MIT license terms >and b) not following ASF policy re 3rd party headers > >For the CreateJS file IMO the solution would be re not remove the MIT >header and add the MIT license text to our LICENSE. > >Alex is of the opinion nothing needs to change but may reconsider after >reading Roy’s Fielding’s response here. [1] Again, Adobe Legal said there is a distinction that an "externs" file is not a derivative work, because it is a list of APIs and not really code. So I would not be disagreeing with Justin if we were creating a derivative work of code. But it isn't the case here. We are simply creating a list. There really isn't any code in an externs file and none of what there is actually goes in the final output. It simply is a list of symbols that should not be renamed. Thanks, -Alex
