The difference between an online playground that shows the generated JS and opening the browser dev tools is that you get instant results from the playground. With the dev tools, you need to set up a project and build it first. I think the playground would be useful for more casual visitors that are still trying to figure out if they're going to download FlexJS at all.
- Josh On Apr 27, 2017 1:10 AM, "OK" <p...@olafkrueger.net> wrote: > >Simply let people see the JavaScript that gets produced from > >ActionScript and MXML with FlexJS. > This might be helpful but on the other side, this is already provided by > any > browsers dev tools. > > >Maybe provide a couple of sample MXML/AS > >files alongside an option to write your own code from scratch. > Yes, I think a combination of pre-compiled samples and the option to > compile > is a good idea. > > >I think Microsoft's Monaco editor would be good for this sort of thing > WoW, it really seems that Microsoft is transforming itself to a completely > new company! > > >but it would be really cool to see IntelliSense/completion > >working from the browser. > Definitely! But for now, I'd be happy to be able to build a very simple app > that probably will just provide some text areas, we'll see ... > > Thanks, > Olaf > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-POC-JSFiddle-for- > FlexJS-Compile-as-a-service-tp61369p61381.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
