What are the new features that would be 0.9.0 worthy?  If it is TLF, the
manual test for TLF with the Text.swc is also broken.  I'm trying to fix
that now.

Personally, I don't care much about what we call this release or what goes
in it, especially if I'm not the RM.  I do think we need to make sure we
didn't break the examples though.

-Alex

On 8/8/17, 7:45 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

>I assume Josh was talking about a hotfix.
>
>I was just thinking that it’s time to release 0.9.0.. I wonder if we
>could just try and get a new release out the door quickly.
>
>I’ll try and spend some time with the examples.
>
>
>> On Aug 8, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> 
>> A 0.8.1 release is fine with me.  However, I just saw that
>> DataBindingExample is broken.  The stock price doesn't show up.  We will
>> probably need to stop and check all of the examples again.  Peter
>>usually
>> helps me do that, but he's on vacation.  Other folks will need to step
>>up
>> to be the RM and help fix the examples.
>> 
>> Go for it,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 8/8/17, 6:41 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com
>><mailto:joshtynj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> (copying from users)
>>> 
>>> PMC,
>>> 
>>> We should consider a 0.8.1 release with some of the recent bug fixes.
>>>The
>>> IntelliJ IDEA fix [1], in particular, seems especially important,
>>> considering this thread. Developers want to to try FlexJS in a familiar
>>> IDE, and 0.8.0 makes that harder right now.
>>> 
>>> It's also like to get the MXML source maps fix [2] released too. We
>>>could
>>> cherry pick some other fixes too, if anyone has some that they think
>>>are
>>> important.
>>> 
>>> - Josh
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.a
>>>pa 
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.
>>>apa>
>>> che.org 
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fche.org
>>>%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C370a6fa33fa4451f10f608d4de6c3646%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438
>>>794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636378003733749673&sdata=cw0p7cvcfDAWIwPqGo%
>>>2Bs2kdYFnu%2BntjbF4fyBi9CL4Q%3D&reserved=0>%2Fthread.html%2F81206edf5224
>>>15581aff6df070140a4f0194410bb76ab2cec0
>>> 8448f3%40%253Cdev.flex.apache.org
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F253cdev
>>>.flex.apache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C370a6fa33fa4451f10f608d4de6c3646%7
>>>Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636378003733749673&sdata=PwM
>>>1%2Fdttde7gbQbYWwlUUhX%2B4PDlF4Q0x5V0ulTiCaE%3D&reserved=0>%253E&data=02
>>>%7C01%7C%7C39ea7917765f4d800
>>> 
>>>fcf08d4de635282%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63637796555
>>>26
>>> 69422&sdata=ijNpBfB4Ve6NmLiKQ5vodOykXuOu4lk4meZTOwfmSFo%3D&reserved=0
>>> [2]
>>> 
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.a
>>>pa 
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.
>>>apa>
>>> che.org 
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fche.org
>>>%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C370a6fa33fa4451f10f608d4de6c3646%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438
>>>794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636378003733749673&sdata=cw0p7cvcfDAWIwPqGo%
>>>2Bs2kdYFnu%2BntjbF4fyBi9CL4Q%3D&reserved=0>%2Fthread.html%2Ff62e1c8341ce
>>>16f29c3adbde5dedc94d41269b939e573b3282
>>> 6be72e%40%253Cdev.flex.apache.org
>>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F253cdev
>>>.flex.apache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C370a6fa33fa4451f10f608d4de6c3646%7
>>>Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636378003733749673&sdata=PwM
>>>1%2Fdttde7gbQbYWwlUUhX%2B4PDlF4Q0x5V0ulTiCaE%3D&reserved=0>%253E&data=02
>>>%7C01%7C%7C39ea7917765f4d800
>>> 
>>>fcf08d4de635282%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63637796555
>>>26
>>> 69422&sdata=yHKn9SScoUolPsg%2FmYw6eb3ePbdiLoO2jKFpNvLOVcQ%3D&reserved=0
>

Reply via email to