Hi Lizhi, I still would like to see a small reproducible test case. If we set a pattern where anyone can hand us 100's of files to debug then we will simply not make much progress on FlexJS. We need you to help us by making a small test case. FlexJS is being developed by a relatively small team. We don't have a staff of folks writing tests so yes, there are going to be plenty of bugs found by users for a while. Even better than asking questions, it would be great if you tried to learn the compiler code and proposed patches.
I know your English skills are challenging for you, but I have found that if you take the time to provide enough detail in the code we can usually understand your question, and these days, if you post in Chinese, Google Translate does a pretty good job of translating. So, please use a text search tool to find out where setTimeout is used in your code and see if you can make a small test case from just those files and post how setTimeout is being used. Thanks, -Alex On 9/2/17, 1:26 AM, "lizhi" <s...@qq.com> wrote: >So how do you solve this bug? Now change this bug, and people who use >flexjs >later will be popular. If you know it is bug, but do not think of ways to >change this bug. Flexjs will only become less and less popular. Because >flash is dead, I don't want to see flexjs die too. Only SDK stability, >reduce bug, will be more and more people use flexjs. More people will use >more and more. Now I feel uncomfortable with this SDK, because every >update >will always encounter a variety of bug, and then I will come to the forum >to >ask questions. And as a Chinese, I'm not very good at communicating in >English > > > >----- >spriteflexjs.com >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf0b22205884b40060 >1cc08d4f1dc4d32%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6363993758960 >75354&sdata=1V87C8XQUYSRwbnuLC79tc5w0edQ4ioXYDJWsDeOfEY%3D&reserved=0
