I was about to start on this in the Ant scripts which got be thinking about how Apache wants source packaging to correspond to binary packaging via a build script. IOW, I don't think it is right to change the current binary packaging script to package up binaries from flex-falcon unless we also start packaging flex-falcon sources in with the flex-asjs sources. And then create a complicated build script for all of those sources.
I'm currently thinking that the best plan is to continue to ship flex-falcon artifacts like we do know and have our Ant build script bring in the flex-falcon artifacts as upstream dependencies. So that will still be more than one release vote thread (one for flex-falcon, one for flex-asjs) but also gives us the opportunity to release compiler fixes separately from the AS framework. But more interestingly, I think it will mean that you can use your flex-asjs working copy as an SDK in Flash Builder and other IDEs which might help folks. Thoughts? -Alex On 9/7/17, 9:57 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Michael Schmalle ><teotigraphix...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> If I could get a zip to just try it, I am all for this. >> >> On the plus side, if you can get a zip only for windows and documented >> setup for quick testing, I think this goes a long way with being able to >> develop the compiler and develop the ui framework separation a lot >>cleaner. >> >> Getting stuff ripped away from the Flash player and Adobe in a new >>project >> is #1. Plus the lightweight nature of not having to download the AIR SDK >> for dev and just js. >> >> @Om what would be the difference between npm and a zip? >> > >npm comes in the picture only for folks who want the swf side of things. >The zip would not create swf files. > > >> >> Mike >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Piotr Zarzycki >><piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> > >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Alex, >> > >> > Since you fake airglobal.swc and playerglobal.swc maybe it will also >>work >> > with Moonshine. I will try to do same operation as you did and see >> whether >> > I will not have previous errors. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Piotr >> > >> > 2017-09-07 18:43 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > > This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. >> > > >> > > I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file >> > download. >> > > >> > > I dont care much for Ant as a requirement, I would rather continue >> > > maintaining the npm FlexJS package for AIR download + setup. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Om >> > > >> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Alex Harui >><aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi folks, >> > > > >> > > > Yesterday, I was able to manually create a folder of files that >> > contained >> > > > no Adobe AIR or Adobe Flash files and still was an acceptable >> > Flex/FlexJS >> > > > SDK for Adobe Flash Builder and allowed me to compile >> > DataBindingExample >> > > > for JSFlex output only (it did not build a SWF). >> > > > >> > > > This is interesting because it could significantly change the way >>we >> > > > package FlexJS releases. We could have a default package that is >>a >> > > > ready-to-use zip of this folder of files. Then the Installer is >>no >> > > longer >> > > > needed if your goal is just to install FlexJS, fire up an IDE, and >> see >> > > how >> > > > it works in the browser without Flash and you don't need to see >>how >> it >> > > > looks in Flash. >> > > > >> > > > If this sound good to folks, I will try to alter the Ant build >> scripts >> > to >> > > > produce such a package (maybe some other volunteer can take on >>doing >> > this >> > > > in Maven). In case you are wondering, what I did was fake some of >> the >> > > > Adobe files that Flash Builder looks for by making copies of some >> > Apache >> > > > files. For example, I copied the js.swc that contains the Object >> > > > definition for the browser to be airglobal.swc and >>playerglobal.swc. >> > So >> > > > far, it appears that Flash Builder is only checking for existence >>of >> > > > files, not actual classes in these files. But we might hit some >>bug >> > > later >> > > > as we test this further. >> > > > >> > > > Then the next question is, what do folks do who want to get SWF >> output? >> > > > We could try to write a script for the Installer that downloads >>the >> AIR >> > > > and Flash SDK and puts them in the right places in the SDK folder >>but >> > it >> > > > will run into the same memory limits that is currently a problem >>for >> > the >> > > > Installer. We could write a new AIR app that brings down the AIR >>and >> > > > Flash SDKs. We could provide Ant scripts that download and deploy >> the >> > > > Adobe bits. I think we already have bash scripts that do this. >>Not >> > sure >> > > > if folks on Windows will be happy with that or not. >> > > > >> > > > Using Ant has the advantage that it works on Windows, Mac and >>Linux. >> > > Bash >> > > > scripts require a shell on Windows. I believe AIR apps have >>issues >> on >> > > > Linux. >> > > > >> > > > We could try to teach the compiler to look for and expand the AIR >>SDK >> > if >> > > > it finds that someone specified SWF output but the AIR SDK is not >> > found. >> > > > It would look in Downloads folders for the most recent AIR SDK >> package >> > > > name. So folks who want SWF output go to the Adobe site, >>download an >> > AIR >> > > > SDK and then run the compiler. >> > > > >> > > > This does make SWF output somewhat "second class" and I still >>believe >> > > that >> > > > folks who want strong-typing and will be using modules will >>benefit >> > from >> > > > at least testing in a Flash/AIR runtime, but I think it makes the >> > > releases >> > > > truly appear independent from Adobe. >> > > > >> > > > Thoughts? >> > > > -Alex >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> > mobile: +48 880 859 557 >> > skype: zarzycki10 >> > >> > LinkedIn: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke >>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc63c39a45d374a38ef2a08d4f611aa5 >>4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636404003122149967&sdata=U >>Yc%2BoDYsD%2FIjYJZeBKREB9XljDtAwhH2bniUaCQ7mb4%3D&reserved=0 >> > >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link >>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc63c39a45d374a3 >>8ef2a08d4f611aa54%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364040031 >>22149967&sdata=ij%2Fk8%2BgVM7yrUgsen2aaju1DRman7SZYCV2HQ6LOSIY%3D&reserve >>d=0> >> > >>