Here are the results:

[9] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
[3] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
[2] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.

Discussion thread - 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/255fab0d229f9912cc14ef40848947ab77234d9a88f5ed7f07f8312c@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E

Vote thread -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f7c8ae50acdf53ca8dc89348c20aa4f724024c1199154f74f6920327@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/455bc64d0bbf654455968196ce10d3b6145a7a99dc5f0c6e82d6cbc6@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E

Tally
No - the name should not be FlexJS (9 No)
Erik de Bruin
David Fisher
Olaf Krueger
Peter Ent
Harbs
Piotr Zarzycki
OmPrakash Muppirala
Kessler CTR Mark J
Carlos Rovira


Yes - the name should be FlexJS (3 Yes)
Christofer Dutz
Justin Mclean
Chris Martin


Abstain (2 Abstain)
Mihai Chira
Alex Harui


On 2017-09-14 11:37, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: 
> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?
> 
> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS.
> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed.
> [ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called.
> 
> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT.
> 
> 

Reply via email to