Consider what Dave mention I agree with Carlos. Although I like Lymbir idea we should not go into that name having such issues. We have still 9 hours of voting and I'm thinking to change my VOTE cause Beads sound to me ok, but it seems to be less powerful. Conversation on users group seems to be also very educational - seeing that there are people who really seeking robust technology to move from Flash.
Let's give them nice sounding name. Thanks, Piotr 2017-09-19 15:50 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>: > Hi, > > sorry to not agree with Limbyr (or limber), but the concept and name > doesn't sound good to me. Although I see the intention behind. > > For me a name should be as direct as possible, that substitution of "e" > with "y" was something used a decade or so ago to get 2.0 names for the > internet, but today is not a good practice in marketing terms. We should > have simple names, simple icons... and there's lots of new domains where we > can find this names unregistered. Today things are very straight forward, > simple and direct. > > This is very subjective but for me flex is "complex", "powerful" technology > (compilers, 2 languages, multiple outputs...) that does not conform IMHO to > something limber... > > One important thing is the proximity to limber.com that Dave arise, that > should not be ignored since, people use to like this kind of similarities > to destroy brands. > > In my mind I use to try to exercise my imagination with joining proposals > of names to what we build, and sorry but I don't see this tech under that > name. > > But if people wants to introduce in the voting, as Piotr said, we should > create a new vote thread so people could repeat the vote and select t if > they want. > > Just my single opinion... > > Best > > Carlos > > > > 2017-09-19 15:01 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>: > > > I read that as Limb Buyer. As in organ trafficking, Let's not :) > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > On 19/09/17 13:05, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: > > > >> to have "Limbyr" - Which I like personally. > >> > > > > > > > -- > > <http://www.codeoscopic.com> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > http://www.avant2.es > > > Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. > -- Piotr Zarzycki mobile: +48 880 859 557 skype: zarzycki10 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
