No, but I don't know whether that's possible.
The style guide prescribes, for example, this:
def foo(
a: Int,
b: String,
c: String)
for methods with long parameter lists while a lot of people do this:
def foo(a: Int,
b: String,
c: String)
(IntelliJ also does this).
The scalastyle rules I added supposedly check for the official scala
guide style but they allow both styles of methods.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Do we already enforce the official Scala style guide strictly?
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm already always sticking to the official Scala style guide, with the
>> exception of 100 line length.
>> On Mar 16, 2015 3:27 PM, "Till Rohrmann" <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for stricter Java code styles. I haven't looked into the Google Code
>> > Style but maybe we make it easier for new contributors if we apply a
>> coding
>> > style which is somehow known.
>> >
>> > +1 for line length of 100 for Scala code. I think it makes code review on
>> > GitHub easier.
>> >
>> > For the Scala style, we could stick to official style guidelines [1].
>> >
>> > [1] http://docs.scala-lang.org/style/
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Hermann Gábor <reckone...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 for the stricter Java code styles.
>> > >
>> > > We should not forget about providing code formatter settings for
>> Eclipse
>> > > and Intellij IDEA (as mentioned above).
>> > > That would help a lot.
>> > >
>> > > (Of course if we'll use Google Code Style, they already provide such
>> > files
>> > > <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/source/browse/trunk/intellij-java-google-style.xml
>> > > >
>> > > .)
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:45 PM Alexander Alexandrov <
>> > > alexander.s.alexand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1 for not limiting the line length.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2015-03-16 14:39 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 for not limiting the line length. Everyone should have a good
>> > sense
>> > > to
>> > > > > break lines. When in exceptional cases people violate this, it is
>> > > usually
>> > > > > for a good reason.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Maximilian Michels <
>> m...@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 for enforcing a more strict Java code style. However, let's
>> not
>> > > > > > introduce a line legth of 100 like in Scala. I think that's
>> hurting
>> > > > > > readability of the code.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Saturday, March 14, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek <
>> > aljos...@apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I'm in favor of strict coding styles. And I like the google
>> > > style.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1 I would like that. We essentially all agree that we want
>> more
>> > > > > > > homogeneity and I think strict rules are the only way to go.
>> > Since
>> > > > this
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > a very subjective matter it makes sense to go with something
>> > > > (somewhat)
>> > > > > > > well
>> > > > > > > established like the Google code style.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
