If we wanted to, we could still release a -milestone2 even with a -milestone.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks like we need to vote on 0.9-beta or 0.9-milestone. > > Can we find consensus whether to add a 1 after the name? -beta1 or > -milestone1. > Adding a 1 allows us to create a second beta/milestone release. > > I'm against adding a 1. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:01, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Two weeks have passed since we've discussed the 0.9 release the last > > time. > > > > > > The ApacheCon is in 18 days from now. > > > If we want, we can also release a "0.9.0-beta" release that contains > > known > > > bugs, but allows our users to try out the new features easily (because > > they > > > are part of a release). The vote for such a release would be mainly > about > > > the legal aspects of the release rather than the stability. So I > suspect > > > that the vote will go through much quicker. > > > > +1 for 0.9-beta > > >
