I've also seen this fail: https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/74025862
in SuccessAfterNetworkBuffersFailureITCase Build seems quite flaky recently. On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 at 10:27 Matthias J. Sax <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > Rebased on: > > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/fab61a1954ff1554448e826e1d273689ed520fc3 > > But if the gap between two rebases is large, it's hard to say what the > problem might be... > > The old parent commit (ie, rebase before last rebase) was > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink/commit/148395bcd81a93bcb1473e4e93f267edb3b71c7e > > -Matthias > > On 08/04/2015 08:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > > What are the commits that you rebased on? Could you maybe narrow down > what > > caused the regression? > > > > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 at 23:31 Matthias J. Sax < > mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> > > wrote: > > > >> I only report failing tests after a rebase. ;) > >> > >> -Matthias > >> > >> On 08/03/2015 11:23 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >>> Thanks for reporting it , Matthias. Will try to run Travis for latest > >> Flink. > >>> > >>> Tachyon test is a bit flaky. Maybe updating to latest release could > help. > >>> > >>> - Henry > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Matthias J. Sax > >>> <mj...@informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote: > >>>> Today, not a single built was successful completely. Please see here: > >>>> > >>>> Flink Streaming Core: > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73938109 > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/mjsax/flink/jobs/73951362 > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938124 > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73899795 > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938122 > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73952441 > >>>> > >>>> Flink Taychon: > >>>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/jobs/73938123 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -Matthias > >>>> > >> > >> > > > >
