This sounds good +1 from me as well :)
Till Rohrmann <till.rohrm...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. szept. 9.,
Sze, 10:40):

> +1 for a milestone release with the TypeInformation issues fixed. I'm
> working on it.
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Great!
> >
> > I'd like to push one more commit later today.
> > A fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632 would also be
> > highly appreciated by some users.
> >
> > Anyone volunteering as release manager (for creating release candidates
> and
> > uploading them)?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for a milestone release
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for a "milestone1" release. We have a lot of good features in
> master
> > > > that people can benefit from.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for releasing a milestone release soon to encourage people to
> try
> > > > > out the new features.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is this bug:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2632
> > > > > which affects the Web Client's error and results display for jobs.
> > > > > Would be nice to fix it but IMHO it is not critical for the
> milestone
> > > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On 08 Sep 2015, at 12:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi all!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Some day back we talked about releasing an 0.10.0-milestone1
> > > release.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> master has advanced quite a bit (especially due to
> > high-availability
> > > > > code).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I cherry picked the important additions to the
> > > > release-0.10.0-milestone1
> > > > > >> branch (fixes and Kafka consumer/producer rework).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> How about releasing the branch now as an intermediate version
> for
> > > > > people to
> > > > > >> try out while we stabilize the windows and HA code for the 0.10
> > > > release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for cping the important changes. I’ve checked and there is
> > > > > nothing I would add at this point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can anybody else took a look at it? Other than that, I think it’s
> > > good
> > > > > to go.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > – Ufuk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to