I won't immediately create the next RC but collect fixes from the community first. Delaying the next release candidate gives us time to find more issues. However, it also contradicts with getting out a release in a timely manner. Since 0.10 is already kind of overdue my take as a release manager is that getting out a new release candidate promptly is an efficient way to push the release process forward.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > How about waiting a bit with the next RC until we have found some more > issues? > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > This vote is cancelled in favor of a new RC. > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > That's a big release blocker. Thanks for the fix, Till! I'm really glad > > we > > > managed to fix this subtle bug. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I fear that I have to give another -1. > > >> > > >> The reason is that in the current RC Flink fails when spilling > > partitions > > >> of the MutableHashTable when performing a join operation with many > > records > > >> which are also large in size. Thus, effectively the join operation is > > >> broken. > > >> > > >> The underlying problem is that the HashPartition does not count the used > > >> memory segments by the BuildSideBuffer when it calculates the number of > > >> occupied memory segments. It the partition in addition does not have any > > >> overflow segments for the table structure, then the assertion that at > > >> least > > >> 2 memory segments have to be available is violated. See > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2964 for more details. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Here is the testing document: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BYtis1Xg2Z9UpeV5UuH2kB6DnisnneOB19L1YBIw4Zs/edit > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > > >> version > > >> > > 0.10.0: > > >> > > > > >> > > The commit to be voted on: > > >> > > 347c2b00d4c32da118460a8da0a417f752f9177e > > >> > > > > >> > > Branch: > > >> > > release-0.10.0-rc5 (see > > >> > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git) > > >> > > > > >> > > The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc5/ > > >> > > > > >> > > The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > >> C2909CBF: > > >> > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > >> > > > > >> > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > >> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1052 > > >> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > >> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of > > at > > >> > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > >> > > > > >> > > The vote ends on Friday November 6, 2015. > > >> > > > > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.0 > > >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > >> > > > > >> > > =================================== > > >> > > > > >> > > The following commits have been added on top of release-0.10.0-rc4: > > >> > > > > >> > > a77d21d [web-frontend] Fix README to to reflect the latest changes > > >> > > 8a4f6f0 [FLINK-2939] add cancel button to web frontend > > >> > > 2009ca1 [FLINK-2953] fix chaining of sortPartition() calls in Scala > > >> > > DataSet API > > >> > > ccddf5d [hotfix] remove Special LICENSE/NOTICE for binary release > > >> > > 0c5ba1f remove flink-benchmark due to licensing issues > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
