Thank you :D

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Max :-)
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Max!
> >
> > 2016-01-19 18:04 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > I've filed an issue at infra to protect the master:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11088
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > +1 for a protected master.
> > > > +1 for creating release tags under rel/.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> +1 for protecting all branches including master.
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> +1 on protecting the master
> > > >>>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 14:46, Márton Balassi <
> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> +1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
> mj...@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On 01/13/2016 11:51 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> > > >>>>>> @Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those
> > > under
> > > >>>>> rel?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org
> >:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang <
> > > >>>>> chengxiang...@intel.com>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1 on the original style.
> > > >>>>>>>> Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and
> > > feature
> > > >>>>>>> branch
> > > >>>>>>>> enable force pushing for flexible developing.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>>>>>> From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org]
> > > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM
> > > >>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of
> branchs
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> +1 for protecting the master branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Gyula
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016.
> jan.
> > > 13.,
> > > >>>>>>> Sze,
> > > >>>>>>>> 11:07):
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi everybody,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all
> Git
> > > >>>>>>>>> repositories twice.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Originally, it was not possible to force into the master
> > branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>> A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other
> > > >>>>> branches.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed
> with
> > > the ASF
> > > >>>>>>>>> board.
> > > >>>>>>>>> The current situation is the following:
> > > >>>>>>>>> - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master
> > > >>>>>>>>> - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies
> as
> > > well
> > > >>>>>>>>> for the master branch)
> > > >>>>>>>>> - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on
> > > refs/tags/rel
> > > >>>>>>>>> - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit
> > > history."
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are
> > > protected
> > > >>>>>>>>> now as I am not very much into the details of Git.
> > > >>>>>>>>> However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for
> our
> > > >>>>>>>>> previous releases to protect them.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add
> > > protection
> > > >>>>>>>>> for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations
> > > where
> > > >>>>>>>>> changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a
> > > reverting
> > > >>>>>>>>> commit now and then compared to a branch that can be
> > arbitrarily
> > > >>>>>>> changed.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> What do you think about this?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Best, Fabian
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Chiwan Park
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to