+1 @Ufuk: Would you be the release manager for that one?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > +1, since user were asking for it. > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 2016-02-02 10:44 GMT+01:00 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>: > > > > > Hi Ufuk, > > > > > > +1 If the fixes are straightforward such that we don't need to test > > > extensively, I'm all for it! Releasing doesn't take much time then. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 for a 0.10.2 maintenance release. > > > > > > > > On Monday, February 1, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hey all, > > > >> > > > >> Our release-0.10 branch contains some important fixes (for example a > > > >> critical fix in the network stack). I would like to hear your > opinions > > > >> about doing a 0.10.2 bug fix release. > > > >> > > > >> I think it's a good idea to go for it now. Even though we have the > > 1.0.0 > > > >> release coming up, it's not clear when exactly it will be ready to > be > > > voted > > > >> on. Furthermore, I don't expect that everyone will immediately > > upgrade. > > > >> Testing a bug fix release is relatively low overhead compared to > > doing a > > > >> major release. It should be doable within the week. > > > >> > > > >> What's your opinion? > > > >> > > > >> If there is a consensus to do it, I would volunteer to be release > > > manager. > > > >> > > > >> – Ufuk > > > >> > > > > > >
