The idea was actually to leverage existing linear algebra libraries such as
breeze instead of building another blas implementation which will never be
as good as the ones out there.

Cheers,
Till

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Theodore Vasiloudis <
theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to note: This should be a separate PR if you plan on contributing
> this.
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > They are at least already registered for serialization [1], so there
> should
> > be no intentional conflict as Theo has suggested.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-libraries/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/common/FlinkMLTools.scala#L67-L73
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Marton
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Theodore Vasiloudis <
> > theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Trevor,
> > >
> > > IIRC it was mostly that they weren't needed at the time. Feel free to
> > add,
> > > along with BLAS ops.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Theo
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Trevor Grant <
> trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a specific reason vectors are imported from Breeze and
> > matrices
> > > > aren't?
> > > >
> > > > Specifically I need to take the dot product of a matrix and a vector
> > and
> > > a
> > > > matrix and a matrix. Was wondering if there is a theoretical reason
> or
> > it
> > > > just wasn't needed at the time.  Looks like some of this got lifted
> > from
> > > > Spark (per the comments in the code, not trying to troll).
> > > >
> > > > I need dot products of matrices and vectors which isn't implemented.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > tg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Trevor Grant
> > > > Data Scientist
> > > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > > > http://trevorgrant.org
> > > >
> > > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."
> -Virgil*
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to