Thanks Maiek On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Maciek Próchniak <m...@touk.pl> wrote:
> This is straightforward, it also shouldn't be problematic performance wise > OTOH, if you want to use stateful sessions things are getting more > complicated - because if you want to play well with Flink you'd have to > integrate drools sessions with checkpoints in Flink - and that can be a bit > more tricky (although certainly possible) > Yes, this is exactly the point I wanted to discuss. And I know Drools stateful can be tricky even without using Flink. However, I was thinking - and am interested to know if this is possible - if it would be possible to do a puedo stateful drools but passing the state from flink into drools stateless. Does that make sense? And would it be possible? Thanks
