Hi, Usually this problem can be well addressed by growing the community. We Just wondering whether there is a wiki to describe how non-committers can help on reviewing the patches?
I'm glad to help out on reviewing patches. Regards, Haohui On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:42 AM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > @Alexey - Pull Requests backlog is going pretty crazy, I agree. > > That is not because the committers are not working on pull requests, there > is simply so many of them. > We are looking for new committers (and discussing in the PMC). > > Tagging is not going to make this better, I believe. It may make it worse, > because it discourages non-tagged community members from picking up a pull > request. > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Anton Solovev <anton_solo...@epam.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, Alexey > > > > I will check abandoned PRs to reduce obviously outdated ones and add them > > to a cleanup list https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5384 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexey Demin [mailto:diomi...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 5:05 PM > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] (Not) tagging reviewers > > > > Hi all > > > > View from my prospective: > > in middle of summer - 150 PR > > in middle of autumn - 180 > > now 206. > > > > This is mix of bugfixes and improvements. > > I understand that work on new features important, but when small and > > trivial fixes stay in states of PR more then 2-3 month, then all users > > think about changing engine on other product. > > > > Only way push people to merge this fixes in master it's tags. > > > > I don't speak about big changes, only about small and trivial with review > > less then 5 min. > > > > Features important, but if this features work incorrect, then user can > > select more stability product without any hesitation. > > > > Thanks > > Alexey Diomin > > > > > > > > 2017-01-16 16:36 GMT+04:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > > > > > On 16 January 2017 at 12:59:04, Paris Carbone (par...@kth.se) wrote: > > > > > Though, when someone has started reviewing a PR and shows interest > > > > it probably makes sense to finish doing so. Wouldn’t tagging be > > > > acceptable there? > > > > In those case tagging triggers direct notifications, so that people > > > > already involved in a conversation get reminded and answer pending > > > > questions. > > > > > > I think that's totally fine Paris since it is more of a reminder in > > > that case. > > > > > > Stephan is referring to PRs that have a last line in the description > > > like "@XZY for review please". > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > > > > >
