Hi,
I tried it with and without RocksDB, no difference. Also tried with the
newest JDK version, still fails for that specific topology.

On the other hand after I made some other changes in the topology (somwhere
else) I can't reproduce it anymore. So it seems to be a very specific
thing. To me it looks like a JVM problem, if it happens again I will let
you know.

Gyula

Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2017. jan. 22., V,
21:16):

> Hey!
>
> I am actually a bit puzzled how these segfaults could come, unless via a
> native library, or a JVM bug.
>
> Can you try how it behaves when not using RocksDB or using a newer JVM
> version?
>
> Stephan
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I am trying to port some of my streaming jobs to Flink 1.2 from 1.1.4
> and I
> > have noticed some very strange segfaults. (I am running in test
> > environments - with the minicluster)
> > It is a fairly complex job so I wouldnt go into details but the
> interesting
> > part is that adding/removing a simple filter in the wrong place in the
> > topology (such as (e -> true)  or anything actually ) seems to cause
> > frequent segfaults during execution.
> >
> > Basically the key part looks something like:
> >
> > ...
> > DataStream stream =
> source.map().setParallelism(1)..uid("AssignFieldIds").
> > name("AssignFieldIds").startNewChain();
> > DataStream filtered = input1.filter(t -> true).setParallelism(1)
> > IterativeStream itStream = filtered.iterate(...)
> > ...
> >
> > Some notes before the actual error: replacing the filter with a map or
> > other chained transforms also leads to this problem. If the filter is not
> > chained there is no error (or if I remove the filter).
> >
> > The error I get looks like this:
> > https://gist.github.com/gyfora/da713b99b1e85a681ff1a4182f001242
> >
> > I wonder if anyone has seen something like this before, or have some
> ideas
> > how to debug it. The simple work around is to not chain the filter but
> it's
> > still very strange.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gyula
> >
>

Reply via email to