Ok cool thnx Till. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Stavros, > > so far we've sticked mainly to scikit-learn in terms of semantics. Thus, I > would recommend to follow scikit-learn's approach to handle NaNs. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Stavros Kontopoulos < > st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > > > Is there a story for this (might have been discussed earlier)? I see > > differences between scikit-learn and numpy. Do we standardize on > > scikit-learn? > > > > PS. I am working on the preprocessing stuff. > > > > Best, > > Stavros > > >
