Thanks Robert, I would like that! +1 for adding something to the Downloads page. Maybe add it to the FAQ and link from the downloads page or the other way around? I don't know what's better.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > I'll update the Wikipedia article and include the details into our wiki. > > In addition, what do you think about adding the "update guarantees" on the > download or FAQ page? > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hey Ismael, >> >> thanks for bringing this up. I think it's a very important to >> communicate this on the project web page. >> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > What do you think guys? Has this been discussed before? Maybe this is a >> > good moment to decide this, if we haven’t. >> >> There was a discussion [1] about adopting time based releases were >> most committers and contributors agreed to support the last two major >> versions, e.g. the latest stable and the previous stable (1.2 and 1.1 >> for our current release). >> >> It would be nice to formulate this officially somewhere with more >> details, e.g. previous major release gets critical bug fixes only. The >> time based releases Wiki page [2] does not do this currently. >> >> Is that in line with the Wikipedia article? It could be that the >> wording was/is confusing. >> >> [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3. >> nabble.com/DISCUSS-Time-based-releases-in-Flink-td15386.html >> >> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Time-based+releases >>
