Hi Robert, Thanks for starting the process!
My only remark is that given that the master is unstable, does it make sense to create an RC0? Kostas > On May 8, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > Great! > It also looks like the other big features made it also into master this > weekend. > > I'll now create the feature branch and create the testing RC0. > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I merged the last to major features for the Table API / SQL (time >> indicators and retraction support) to master. >> We will need to work on some smaller issues for those features which will >> take a few more days (1 week max), but the big changes are in. >> >> Working on those final issue does not block a release candidate. The Table >> API / SQL are on top of the DataStream API and runtime. >> So the last fixes won't interfere with testing the lower levels of the >> system. >> >> Cheers, Fabian >> >> 2017-05-05 21:02 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: >> >>> Yes, I second Ufuk, thanks Robert and Aljoscha for the effort. >>> >>> Thanks to the community for hard work on the features. >>> >>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> Also, if no release candidate would be created today, it would not >> make >>>> any >>>>> difference anyways... >>>> >>>> If no one tests a RC (if created today) over the weekend it also >>>> wouldn't make a difference. ;-) >>>> >>>> Thanks to all for chiming in here and Robert and Aljoscha especially >>>> for making sure that everyone is on the same page wrt blockers etc. >>>> >>> >>
