+10 I think it makes sense spark is also using 2.11 as the default for
quite some time.

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Bowen Li <bowen...@offerupnow.com> wrote:

> EMR's builtin Flink is always 1 or 2 versions behind Flink latest release.
> We choose to install Flink on EMR ourselves.
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:37 AM, 郭健 <guo.j...@immomo.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Most of the time I need to build scala-2.11 version, although I can use
> > the script tools/change-version.sh to change scala version in all poms,
> it
> > breaks the code consistency with the  master branch.
> >
> > Aegeaner
> >
> >
> > On 6/28/17, 22:23, "Piotr Nowojski" <pi...@data-artisans.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Yes, I know and I’m proposing to change this in parent pom by default
> > to scala-2.11.
> >
> >     Changing parent pom every time anyone wants to touch/build in
> Intellij
> > Kafka 0.11 connector is not a great idea. This would require a developer
> to
> > constantly stash those changes or commit and revert them before creating
> a
> > pull request.
> >
> >     Piotrek
> >
> >     > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com>
> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > You don't need to use the build profile in IntelliJ, just change
> >     > scala.version and scala.binary.version in the parent pom (recent
> >     > refactorings made this possible without changing every pom).
> >     >
> >     > What is the benefit for changing the default without dropping older
> >     > versions when contributions are still limited to the functionality
> > of the
> >     > old version?
> >     >
> >     > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Piotr Nowojski <
> > pi...@data-artisans.com>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >> Hi,
> >     >>
> >     >> I propose to switch to Scala 2.11 as a default and to have a Scala
> > 2.10
> >     >> build profile. Now it is other way around. The reason for that is
> > poor
> >     >> support for build profiles in Intellij, I was unable to make it
> > work after
> >     >> I added Kafka 0.11 dependency (Kafka 0.11 dropped support for
> Scala
> > 2.10).
> >     >>
> >     >> As a side note, maybe we should also consider dropping Scala 2.10
> > support?
> >     >>
> >     >> Piotrek
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to