My understanding was that the synchronization was bidirectional but clearly
we’re working without documentation.
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Apache-Karaf-Slack-amp-discuss-about-GitBox-td4050669.html
<http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Apache-Karaf-Slack-amp-discuss-about-GitBox-td4050669.html>
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-GitBox-td21160.html
<http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-GitBox-td21160.html>
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> According to the JIRA you linked, you can push the the apache repo, but it
> will be overridden by GitHub.
> (as it should since the GitHub repo is the original)
>
> The solution offered in the JIRA is to (force) push to the github repo
> instead of the apache one.
> Unless I'm misunderstanding this doesn't appear to change anything.
>
> On 18.07.2017 14:37, Greg Hogan wrote:
>> You are not able to push to the ASF repo? This link implies that both work
>> (and identify an issue now addressed):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14039
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14039>
>>
>> From my .git/config:
>>
>> [remote "origin"]
>> url = g...@github.com:apache/flink-shaded.git
>> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>> [remote "apache"]
>> url = https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-shaded.git
>> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/apache/*
>> [branch "master"]
>> remote = origin
>> merge = refs/heads/master
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> So committers would still need to link their accounts.
>>>
>>> Source for the mirror info:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13926
>>>
>>> On 18.07.2017 13:50, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>> Alright, so there is an apache repo that can found at
>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-shaded.git
>>>> but it is a mirror of the github repo.
>>>>
>>>> For flink, we push to apache and it is mirrored to github.
>>>> For flink-shaded, we push to github and it is mirror to apache.
>>>>
>>>> On 18.07.2017 13:47, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>>>>> I'm not aware of any asf hosted repository for gitbox projects; if you
>>>>> look at the flink-shaded repository you will
>>>>> not see any mention of it being a mirror, compared to the flink repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> The git-wip-us.apache.org repo for flink-shaded was removed when we
>>>>> switched.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18.07.2017 13:27, Greg Hogan wrote:
>>>>>> Linking is required to commit to the ASF hosted repo as well as the
>>>>>> GitHub repo? My understanding was that linking and 2FA was only required
>>>>>> to commit through GitHub, so no one would have diminished capabilities.
>>>>>> I’d generally recommend only ever writing to a single repo to prevent
>>>>>> concurrent commits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We recently moved flink-shaded to GitBox; overall I'm quite happy with
>>>>>>> how it works.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, it is not possible for committers to push commits that haven't
>>>>>>> gone through the github/asf
>>>>>>> account linking process (https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I verified this today in an experiment with the help of Robert.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The linking process requires every committer to join the ASF github
>>>>>>> organization, include their github username
>>>>>>> in the apache profile, and setup 2-factor-authorization for their
>>>>>>> github account.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While i would love to have the gitbox functionality for the Flink
>>>>>>> repository I don't know whether we want to
>>>>>>> impose these requirements on all committers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21.06.2017 19:49, Robert Metzger wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 for trying out Gitbox!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that with GitBox project committers who have
>>>>>>>>> linked
>>>>>>>>> Apache and GitHub accounts are given organization write permissions.
>>>>>>>>> Other
>>>>>>>>> contributors will continue to have read permissions.
>>>>>>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/repository-permission-levels-for-an-
>>>>>>>>> organization/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The last comment noting the “split-brain” shouldn’t preclude the use
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> GitBox but we should come to a general consensus before switching to
>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>> into the GitHub repo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If we want to try GitHub for flink-web, a second step could to switch
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> use with the nascent flink-libraries.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:50 AM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Found some info in this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/INFRA-14191
>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, Gitbox is still in the beta phase. There are no public
>>>>>>>>>> docs
>>>>>>>>> for it yet.
>>>>>>>>>> Committers are required to link their apache & GitHub accounts, which
>>>>>>>>> requires 2FA on GitHub.
>>>>>>>>>> As it stands I would be in favor of Gregs original suggestion of
>>>>>>>>> activating it for flink-web as a test bed.
>>>>>>>>>> I would wait with the main repo until we actually have more info and
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> is a bit more proven.
>>>>>>>>>> On 11.06.2017 19:37, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I would also like to see this happening for both flink-web and flink
>>>>>>>>>>> if it allows committers to have control over the respective repos.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Chesnay Schepler
>>>>>>>>>>> <ches...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the downsides of this? Actually, is there any ASF resource
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> outlines what this would enable?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In one of the threads i saw said that this would also allow
>>>>>>>>>>>> committers
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> close PR's, assign labels and such.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This sounds very interesting to me for the main repo actually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09.06.2017 17:41, Greg Hogan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert has an open PR from March. I’ve found, for example, PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> links to talks or slides left open for months.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’d suggest Fluo is to Accumulo as flink-web is to the flink
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that migration looks to be satisfactory.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bq. better track the oft-neglected contributions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have estimate on how many contributions were not paid
>>>>>>>>> attention in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the current infrastructure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at #2, it seems Accumulo community hasn't reached
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ASF now has available (and maybe mandatory for new projects or
>>>>>>>>> repos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GitBox [0] which enables bi-directional sync to GitHub and links
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers' accounts, allowing for greater use of GitHub
>>>>>>>>> functionality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors and for committers to perform many tasks otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requiring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFRA tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to propose moving flink-web [1] to GitBox, using GitHub
>>>>>>>>> issues,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and enabling notifications to the mailing lists. Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Accumulo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently discussed [2] this topic with a list of benefits after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migrating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fluo. By migrating flink-web we can better track the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oft-neglected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributions and also test the waters for future migrations
>>>>>>>>> (perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future sub-projects).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [0] https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pulls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GitBox-tp21160p21497.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greg
>>>>
>>
>
