With 24 hours now having passed, this vote is now complete. I'll summarise the 
results in an extra thread.

Best,
Aljoscha
> On 5. Aug 2017, at 07:49, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bowen,
> 
> You're right, I didn't give a lot of thought to Kinesis because there were 
> critical bugs in Kafka and incremental checkpointing that needed to be fixed 
> quickly. It's not good to neglect another important connector for this, 
> though. We should start focusing on the Kinesis issues next week and soon do 
> a 1.3.3 release that will then mostly contain the Kinesis fixes. What do you 
> think?
> 
> Best,
> Aljoscha
> 
>> On 5. Aug 2017, at 03:38, Greg Hogan <c...@greghogan.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Aljoscha!
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> - verified source and binary signatures
>> - verified source and binary checksums
>> - verified LICENSEs
>> - verified NOTICEs
>> - built from source
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>>> On Aug 4, 2017, at 2:00 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 1.3.2, 
>>> as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases to be 
>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with 
>>> fingerprint 0xA8F4FD97121D7293 [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "release-1.3.2-rc2" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding announcement blog 
>>> post [6]. 
>>> 
>>> The only change in this RC compared to the last is this commit that fixes 
>>> copying of the Gelly examples jar: 
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/fda455e23a6192200b85b84d3aee312c9be40c99.
>>>  I would therefore like to propose a shorter voting period because the last 
>>> RC was seemingly good except for this bug. Please voice your concerns about 
>>> this if you have any. The vote will be open for at least 24 hours. It is 
>>> adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> 
>>> Please use the provided document, as discussed before, for coordinating the 
>>> testing efforts: [7]. I have copied over the cluster testing efforts and 
>>> functional testing efforts since the code of this RC is exactly the same as 
>>> RC2.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aljoscha
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12340984
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aljoscha/flink-1.3.2-rc3/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1135/
>>> [5] 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=d0f7528a69a93045f4af686347753f8737ca0b2b
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/75
>>> [7] 
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OJAE6scAZXbSBaGNNEpU1qhr3Jb7bwbec7keEnT9hmA/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
> 

Reply via email to