+1
> Am 22.08.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>:
>
> Please go ahead +1
>
> Thank you for taking care!
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>> On 22. Aug 2017, at 18:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quick update: If there are no objections, I will start looking into
>>>> how to stop serving the docs for Flink < 1.0 after tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for your early feedback Kostas and Ted.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Kostas: I have a proposal for a more obvious warning here:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4553 Would appreciate comments in
>>>>> that PR too :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Without any upgrade path, the old versions are not useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 on redirecting doc to stable release(s).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kostas Kloudas <
>>>> k.klou...@data-artisans.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Ufuk,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that this is a nice change!
>>>>>>> Thanks Ufuk for opening the discussion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that broken/redirect links are not an issue,
>>>>>>> as either way the information provided is far outdated
>>>>>>> (== wrong).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As for the warning, we cannot put it in the header instead
>>>>>>> of the footer? Sth like, this page may contain outdated info,
>>>>>>> please refer to XXX for an updated version.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kostas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey devs,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to stop serving the documentation for all Flink
>> versions
>>>>>>>> prior to 1.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have any concerns about this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These Flink versions are very old without any upgrade path to newer
>>>>>>>> versions but they still get a lot of traffic and most new users
>> don't
>>>>>>>> realize that they are looking at a very outdated docs page.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even with a stronger warning about being outdated, I don't see a
>>>> point
>>>>>>>> in serving them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we choose to do this, I would redirect these ancient pages to the
>>>>>>>> docs of the latest stable release and update the release process
>> Wiki
>>>>>>>> page to update those redirects etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This will mean that some links in old StackOverflow questions and
>> the
>>>>>>>> mailing list archives will be broken/redirected. If you have
>> concerns
>>>>>>>> about this, please raise your voice in this thread.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> – Ufuk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PS: I've created an issue to improve the visibility of the outdated
>>>>>>>> warning here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7462. I
>>>> will
>>>>>>>> only apply this to versions >= 1.0 for now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
