Hi! A lot of projects evolve out of use cases, Flink evolved out of the Bug Data ecosystem
On Nov 12, 2017 02:02, "Cristian Lorenzetto" <cristian.lorenze...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sincerely i dont understand how it is developed this project. > You are essentially developing a streaming management permits complex > internal states, permits to split streams in parallel way , to merge and > reduce streams in statefull way. It is great idea. But this is a generic > concept. Does this abstract concept need hadoop for exiting ?No. It is a > generic and abstract solution for many problems. Does this concept need to > know the client-server concept for working and need to be part of a client > -server concept for being what is ?No > > You developed flink project embedding strict dependencies with hadoop, with > yarn in a monolitic project that pratically blocks anyone to use it in a > different way from how you embedded inside your solution. You merged a > abstract algorithmic idea with many other things not strictly related. In > addition you developed it as server solution.You merged a generic algorithm > with a concrete application of this algorithm. This method to develop > blocks anyone want use your abstract concept for doing something over. The > world evolves when a tecnology is easy to reuse for creating other more > complex solution over, when the people neednt to go inside what it is > invented or delivered for a new idea ,because they can compose your idea > with others. This composition process permits to evolves the tecnologies. > In short , the right way is to develop short libraries containing the > strict logic necesssary for implementing that idea. And then you can > implement you solution/application based on it. > Think for a moment to another big solution how is lucene. It is developed > as a indipendent library. In a decades , tons of open sources and > commercial solutions were developed over lucene. The lucene team didnt > developed it like a server. Anyway then they developped elasticsearch > server. If they would have developed directly elastic search do you think > the open source history was the same? Your abstract idea is very good and > can be aplied in many different ways . Do not block the future.To rewrite > all for a new application based on the same idea requires a effort and > money few people /companies have. Sincerelly a so grave error for a open > source foundation like Apache foundation is incomprehensible. I hope it > could be solved in future for the good of open source future. > > All the best for the open source world > > bye >
