> On May 3, 2018, at 9:06 PM, Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Agree it is definitely not intuitive trying to figure out what to do based
> on this message.
> I think the message should be changed to "please consider increasing
> maximum permitted memory size, increase task manager parallelism, or using
> a non-memory-based state backend".
> 
> Could you please open a JIRA ticket in:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues/

Sure, see

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9300 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9300>

— Ken

> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Ken Krugler <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Currently in the MemCheckpointStreamFactory.checkSize() method, it can
>> throw an IOException with:
>> 
>>                        throw new IOException(
>>                                        "Size of the state is larger than
>> the maximum permitted memory-backed state. Size="
>>                                                        + size + " ,
>> maxSize=" + maxSize
>>                                                        + " . Consider
>> using a different state backend, like the File System State backend.");
>> 
>> But this will happen even if you’re using the File System State backend,
>> right?
>> 
>> This came up here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50149005/
>> ioexception-size-of-the-state-is-larger-than-the-maximum-
>> permitted-memory-backe <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50149005/
>> ioexception-size-of-the-state-is-larger-than-the-maximum-
>> permitted-memory-backe>
>> 
>> So shouldn’t it suggest using the RocksDB state backend instead?
>> 
>> — Ken

--------------------------------------------
http://about.me/kkrugler
+1 530-210-6378

Reply via email to