Hi jiaxl, The paper you mentioned was published at 2017. I think it doesn't have much reference value now. Over time, both frameworks are constantly evolving. At the end of May this year, Flink has supported the major feature of local recovery in the latest release of version 1.5. This greatly improves the speed of recovery. Flink has not stopped the improvement of state recovery and fault tolerance. I think you can verify it yourself.
Thanks, vino. 2018-07-24 23:15 GMT+08:00 jiaxl <jthunder1...@hotmail.com>: > From conclusion of this paper https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3132750 > <https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3132750http://> , Flink's recovery > speed is slower than that of Spark Streaming, which will be a problem in > large scale deployment where fault happens frequently. > I'd like to know whether this is still a problem or not. Any advices are > appreciated. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ >
