Hey, Sorry for the delay. Yes -- I would be open to revisit the underlying technologies.
Best, Robert On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:28 AM Fabian Wollert <fab...@zalando.de> wrote: > Hi everyone, thx for all the comments and feedback. Let me address > everything individually: > > @Till: yes, for the start my plan would be to just touch the > flink-runtime-web/web-dashboard repo/folder. > > @Jin Sun: > > - smaller icons on increasing server counts: yes, thats also something i > already thought about. will keep it in mind when realizing the first > version! > - about locality: i searched quickly through the docs, but i could not > find anything regarding flink featuring rack awareness. Is this > something > already implemented? If not, i think this will bloat the size of this > initial proposal. If its somewhere already included, we could implement > it > for sure. > > @Zhijiang:the focus of this redesign was not yet including the job list in > the lower half of the overview. as part of the redesign we can also think > about optimising this list though, and removing unnecessary columns is > usually the most easy thing to do. we can maybe create a separate ticket > for this as well and discuss this issue there, to not bloat the initial > discussion with too much topics. > > @Robert: > > - Agreed that it might make sense to also show this on job level. Since > these metrics are probably gonna be introduced later only anyways, we > can > discuss this maybe then separately after FLINK-9050 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9050> (linked the wrong > ticket in my initial mail) is done. > - Rewriting the whole thing while doing this also came to my mind. What > i would like to do anyways (even if we stick for now to A1) is to remove > bower as a package manager (since its deprecated) and update bootstrap > to > V4. I will check what the additional effort is to move to React/Redux. > We're working with this here at work as well, so implementing at least a > first MVP might be feasible as well, before getting to deep into A1 > specifics. But that basically means that you guys are open to change the > underlying web/JS technology, yeah? > > Cheers > > -- > > > *Fabian WollertZalando SE* > > E-Mail: fab...@zalando.de > > > Am Mi., 10. Okt. 2018 um 08:41 Uhr schrieb Robert Metzger < > rmetz...@apache.org>: > > > Hey Fabian, > > thanks a lot for reaching out to the Flink community with this proposal! > > (Posting to the ML instead of creating a JIRA is a good idea for such > > questions -- you can create a ticket/tickets once the discussion here has > > come to a conclusion) > > > > I have two comments: > > - You are listing Records/Kb in and Records/Kb out as cluster-wide > metrics. > > I wonder whether we should rather show these metrics for each job, > instead > > of the entire cluster? (or maybe both). My concern is that the > cluster-wide > > metric is not really relevant as soon as you have jobs with different > > characteristics running on one cluster > > - You mention that the Flink UI is based on Angular 1. I've been thinking > > for quite a while now whether we should actually rewrite / migrate the > > Flink UI to React. > > Do you think we can re-use most of the work you'd be doing for this > change > > when we migrate to React? > > > > Best, > > Robert > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:24 AM Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) > > <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Fabian for proposing this topic. > > > > > > It is very worth improving the web dashborad for showing more useful > > > informations which can benefit flink users a lot. > > > > > > Just two small personal concerns: > > > 1. The start time and end time are already given, so it is easy to > > > estimate the rough duration time. Is it necessary to show the duration > > > information to occupy the space? > > > 2. The job name given by users can be used for identification, and the > > > job id is automatically generated in random. I am not sure whether this > > id > > > is useful for further debugging. If not maybe we can ignore the job id > > from > > > the dashboard? > > > > > > Best, > > > Zhijiang > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > 发件人：Jin Sun <isun...@gmail.com> > > > 发送时间：2018年10月10日(星期三) 01:10 > > > 收件人：dev <dev@flink.apache.org> > > > 主 题：Re: [DISCUSS] Flink Cluster Overview Dashboard Improvement Proposal > > > > > > Great job! That would very helpful for debug. > > > > > > > > > - I would suggest to use small icons for this Job Manager/Managers > > > when there are too many instances (like a thousand) > > > - May be we can also introduce locality, that task managers belongs > > > to same rack shows together? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Small icons can be like this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 2018, at 8:49 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > mation on the front > > > page. Your mock looks really promising to me since it shows some basic > > > metrics and cluster information at a glance. Apart from the the source > > > input and sink output metrics, all other required information should be > > > available to display it in the dashboard. Thus, your proposal should > only > > > affect flink-runtime-web which should make it easier to realize. > > > > > > I'm in favour of adding this feature to Flink's dashboard to make it > > > available to the whole community. > > > > > > > > > > > >
