You're right Chesnay, I didn't remember that .of was introduced :(
Sorry!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
wrote:
> You could even use a method reference here: "map(Row::of)"
>
> On 22/03/2019 12:33, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > I can see that this would be convenient but please find a better
> > example; yours can be solved easily using "Row.of(value)".
> >
> > On 22/03/2019 12:26, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> many times I had the feeling that allowing Row.setField() to return the
> >> modified object instead of void would really make the (Java) code
> >> cleaner
> >> in a very unobtrusive way.
> >> For example, I could write something like:
> >>
> >> DataSet<Row> columnData = input.map(value -> new Row(1).setField(0,
> >> value))
> >>
> >> instead of:
> >>
> >> DataSet<Row> columnData = input//
> >> .map(value -> {
> >> Row r = new Row(1);
> >> r.setField(0, value);
> >> return r;
> >> })
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >> May I open a JIRA issue about it?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Flavio
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
