Hi Aljoscha,
Thanks for bringing this up. The release-1.8 we have been prepared 4 times
RC, and in addition to one performance issue, all of the rest are NOTICE
issues. We really need to pay attention on this.

I agree with Ufuk, improve the `flink-bot` is a good idea. And the
committer who merge the changes also needs to pay more attention to check
if the change involves NOTICE changes.

Thanks,
Jincheng

Bowen Li <bowenl...@gmail.com> 于2019年3月24日周日 下午2:04写道:

> Hi,
>
> I agree with Ufuk that we can start with something simple, achievable, yet
> effective, like using flink-bot. The wiki that explains licensing of Flink
> is very good but hard to be found and noticed by new contributors, do we
> have plan to move it to a more discoverable place like flink.apache.org?
> Well, even with that, it may not be so directly effective as flinkt-bot
> IMO. We will of course also continue evaluating more automated ways to
> solve this problem.
>
> Besides, there's another proposal from Jark [1] to use flink-bot to help
> community keep docs in English and Chinese in sync. Looks like we have
> general desires for flink-bot to remind contributors of different
> requirements according to modules they modify, and we may want to develop
> and adapt flink-bot to fulfill that need. I personally believe flink-bot
> has proven to be handy, productive and user-friendly since it's created,
> and we may increase investment on flink-bot for helping devs with
> miscellaneous issues like LICENSING and NOTICE.
>
> [1]
>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Improve-the-flinkbot-tp26965p27863.html
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > There are definitely license checking tools around that can generate
> > NOTICE files etc. I don't have the details, but Robert should have
> > some input here. I don't know whether they would fit our setup and how
> > we would integrate them or whether INFRA can get them for is.
> >
> > Note that simple things can already improve the experience going
> > forward. A simple thing for the flink-bot could be to require/propose
> > a NOTICE file check whenever a pom.xml file was modified. What do you
> > think?
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:43 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Realistically you can't automatically infer from changes to any pom
> > whether and what we have to change in the notice files.
> > > Doing this on the XML level requires a view over the entire project to
> > detect dependency changes in parent modules / dependency management and
> > packaging changes in downstream modules (like flink-dist); this would be
> > ridiculously complex check.
> > >
> > > Whether you have to change something can be inferred from the
> > shade-plugin output, but not 100% reliably (for example, if a dependency
> is
> > declared to be included but everything is filtered out (yeah, that
> > happened)).
> > > Theoretically it is even possible to generate the licensing files from
> > said output, but haven't had time yet to look into whether this is truly
> > possible.
> > >
> > > On 19.03.2019 07:15, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Aljoscha,
> > >
> > > thanks for bringing this up. I think that we should either integrate
> > > checks for this into our CI/CD environment (using existing tools) or
> > > add a conditional check for this into flink-bot in case a pom.xml was
> > > modified. Otherwise it will be easy to forget in the future.
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:03 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Please remember to add newly added dependencies to the NOTICE file of
> > flink-dist (which will then end up in NOTICE-binary and so on).
> Discovering
> > this late will cause delays in releases, as it is doing now.
> > >
> > > There is a handy guide that Chesnay and Till worked on that explains
> > licensing for Apache projects and Flink specifically:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing>
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Aljoscha
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to