Hi folks, I would like to start the FLIP discussion thread about supporting local aggregation in Flink.
In short, this feature can effectively alleviate data skew. This is the FLIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-44%3A+Support+Local+Aggregation+in+Flink *Motivation* (copied from FLIP) Currently, keyed streams are widely used to perform aggregating operations (e.g., reduce, sum and window) on the elements that have the same key. When executed at runtime, the elements with the same key will be sent to and aggregated by the same task. The performance of these aggregating operations is very sensitive to the distribution of keys. In the cases where the distribution of keys follows a powerful law, the performance will be significantly downgraded. More unluckily, increasing the degree of parallelism does not help when a task is overloaded by a single key. Local aggregation is a widely-adopted method to reduce the performance degraded by data skew. We can decompose the aggregating operations into two phases. In the first phase, we aggregate the elements of the same key at the sender side to obtain partial results. Then at the second phase, these partial results are sent to receivers according to their keys and are combined to obtain the final result. Since the number of partial results received by each receiver is limited by the number of senders, the imbalance among receivers can be reduced. Besides, by reducing the amount of transferred data the performance can be further improved. *More details*: Design documentation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gizbbFPVtkPZPRS8AIuH8596BmgkfEa7NRwR6n3pQes/edit?usp=sharing Old discussion thread: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Support-Local-Aggregation-in-Flink-td29307.html#a29308 JIRA: FLINK-12786 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12786> We are looking forwards to your feedback! Best, Vino
