+1 for 1.9.1 soon :)

I would also like to include a fix to:
FLINK-14145 - getLatestCheckpoint(true) returns wrong checkpoint

It is already merged to master and just need to merge it to 1.9 if we all
agree (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9756)

Cheers,
Gyula

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:23 AM Terry Wang <zjuwa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM.
> Thanks Jark for driving on this.
>
> Best,
> Terry Wang
>
>
>
> > 在 2019年9月24日,下午2:19,Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >
> > Thanks Till for reviewing FLINK-14010.
> >
> > Hi Jeff, I think it makes sense to merge FLINK-13708 before the release
> (PR
> > has been reviewed).
> >
> > Hi Debasish, FLINK-12501 has already been merged in 1.10.0. I'm fine to
> > cherry-pick it to 1.9 if we
> > have a consensus this issue could be viewed as a bug. We can continue the
> > discussion in the JIRA.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jark
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 13:39, Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for 1.9.1 release and Jark being the RM. Thanks Jark for kicking off
> >> this release and the volunteering.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dian
> >>
> >>> 在 2019年9月24日,上午10:45,Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >>>
> >>> +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM.
> >>> Thanks Jark for the volunteering.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Kurt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:17 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 for the 1.9.1 release and for Jark being the RM. I'll help with the
> >>>> review of FLINK-14010.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Till
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:32 AM Debasish Ghosh <
> >> ghosh.debas...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I hope https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12501 will also
> be
> >>>> part
> >>>>> of 1.9.1 ..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:39 AM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> FLINK-13708 is also very critical IMO. This would cause invalid
> flink
> >>>> job
> >>>>>> (doubled output)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13708
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月23日周一 下午2:03写道:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It has already been a month since we released Flink 1.9.0.
> >>>>>>> We already have many important bug fixes from which our users can
> >>>>> benefit
> >>>>>>> in the release-1.9 branch (83 resolved issues).
> >>>>>>> Therefore, I propose to create the next bug fix release for Flink
> >>>> 1.9.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Most notable fixes are:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13526] When switching to a non existing catalog or
> database
> >>>> in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> SQL Client the client crashes.
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13568] It is not possible to create a table with a
> "STRING"
> >>>>> data
> >>>>>>> type via the SQL DDL.
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13941] Prevent data-loss by not cleaning up small part
> files
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> S3.
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13490][jdbc] If one column value is null when reading
> JDBC,
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>> following values will all be null.
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14107][kinesis] When using event time alignment with the
> >>>>>> Kinsesis
> >>>>>>> Consumer the consumer might deadlock in one corner case.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Furthermore, I would like the following critical issues to be
> merged
> >>>>>> before
> >>>>>>> 1.9.1 release:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14118] Reduce the unnecessary flushing when there is no
> data
> >>>>>>> available for flush which can save 20% ~ 40% CPU. (reviewing)
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-13386] Fix A couple of issues with the new dashboard have
> >>>>>> already
> >>>>>>> been filed. (PR is created, need review)
> >>>>>>> - [FLINK-14010][yarn] The Flink YARN cluster can get into an
> >>>>> inconsistent
> >>>>>>> state in some cases, where
> >>>>>>> leaderhship for JobManager, ResourceManager and Dispatcher
> components
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>> split between two master processes. (PR is created, need review)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would volunteer as release manager and kick off the release
> process
> >>>>>> once
> >>>>>>> blocker issues has been merged. What do you think?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If there is any other blocker issues need to be fixed in 1.9.1,
> >>>> please
> >>>>>> let
> >>>>>>> me know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Jark
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Best Regards
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jeff Zhang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Debasish Ghosh
> >>>>> http://manning.com/ghosh2
> >>>>> http://manning.com/ghosh
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Twttr: @debasishg
> >>>>> Blog: http://debasishg.blogspot.com
> >>>>> Code: http://github.com/debasishg
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to