+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Timo


On 21.10.19 15:59, Till Rohrmann wrote:
+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:

+1 (binding)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:06 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:

This is the official vote whether to accept the Stateful Functions code
contribution to Apache Flink.

The current Stateful Functions code, documentation, and website can be
found here:
https://statefun.io/
https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions

This vote should capture whether the Apache Flink community is interested
in accepting, maintaining, and evolving Stateful Functions.

Reiterating my original motivation, I believe that this project is a
great
match for Apache Flink, because it helps Flink to grow the community
into a
new set of use cases. We see current users interested in such use cases,
but they are not well supported by Flink as it currently is.

I also personally commit to put time into making sure this integrates
well
with Flink and that we grow contributors and committers to maintain this
new component well.

This is a "Adoption of a new Codebase" vote as per the Flink bylaws [1].
Only PMC votes are binding. The vote will be open at least 6 days
(excluding weekends), meaning until Tuesday Oct.29th 12:00 UTC, or until
we
achieve the 2/3rd majority.

Happy voting!

Best,
Stephan

[1]

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026


Reply via email to