+1 to align the terminology. *Best Regards,* *Zhenghua Gao*
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:59 PM Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for this documentation change. > Hope less confuse to users. > > Best, > Jingsong Lee > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 12:09 PM Benchao Li <libenc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > It's good to align the terminology between Table API & SQL and > DataStream. > > > > Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月3日周五 下午12:04写道： > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > As we discussed in the mailing list[1], the current "Time-windowed > Join" > > in > > > Table API & SQL is a little misleading which is not the same to "Window > > > Join" in DataStream, but the same to "Interval Join" in DataStream. > > > > > > So I would like to start a vote to rename the terminology of > > "Time-windowed > > > Join" to "Interval Join" in Table API & SQL **before 1.10 release**. > > > > > > Note that this is a purely documentation change, no updates for public > > API > > > or Javadocs. Updates for implementation codes (e.g. rename > > > DataStreamWindowJoin) is not targeted to 1.10. > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an > > objection. > > > This vote is required Consensus Approval which is the same to a FLIP > > vote. > > > > > > Best, > > > Jark > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Correct-the-terminology-of-quot-Time-windowed-Join-quot-to-quot-Interval-Join-quot-in-Table-L-td36202.html > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Benchao Li > > School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University > > Tel:+86-15650713730 > > Email: libenc...@gmail.com; libenc...@pku.edu.cn > > > > > -- > Best, Jingsong Lee >
