+1
I approve this FLIP.
Best,
Aljoscha
On 20.01.20 15:24, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
Thank you all for the votes.
So far we have received 7 approving votes, 2 of which are binding and there is
no -1 votes:
* Nico (binding)
* Zhijiang (binding)
* Zhenghua (non-binding)
* Yun (non-binding)
* Haibo (non-binding)
* Jingsong (non-binding)
* Arvid (non-binding)
Therefore, I'm happy to announce that FLIP-92 has been accepted.
I have also created a Jira ticket to track the work [1]
Thanks everyone!
Piotrek
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15688>
On 20 Jan 2020, at 14:42, Nico Kruber <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Aside the mentioned use cases in SQL/Batch, I also see advantages in
streaming where joining multiple streams together seems to be quite
common, too. For that, however, we would need the addition in the
DataStream API... but agreed it could be done in a second step
Nico
On 14/01/2020 02:44, Zhenghua Gao wrote:
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving this. It's an important improvement in
the discussed scenarios.
*Best Regards,*
*Zhenghua Gao*
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:13 PM Haibo Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Haibo
At 2020-01-13 11:36:12, "Yun Gao" <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 (non-binding).
Very thanks for introducing this topic back, and it should be able to
bring improvements in the discussed scenarios.
Best,
Yun
------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Arvid Heise <[email protected]>
Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 16:48
To:dev <[email protected]>; Zhijiang <[email protected]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
non-binding +1
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Zhijiang <[email protected]
.invalid>
wrote:
+1, it is really nice to have the N-Ary stream operator which is
meaningful in some scenarios.
best,
Zhijiang
------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Jingsong Li <[email protected]>
Send Time:2020 Jan. 10 (Fri.) 11:00
To:dev <[email protected]>
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-92: Add N-Ary Stream Operator in Flink
+1 non-binding to the N-Ary Stream Operator. Thanks Piotr for driving.
Looks like the previous FLIP-92 did not change the "Next FLIP Number" in
FLIP page.
Best,
Jingsong Lee
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:40 AM Benchao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Piotr,
It seems that we have the 'FLIP-92' already.
see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-92%3A+JDBC+catalog+and+Postgres+catalog
Piotr Nowojski <[email protected]> 于2020年1月9日周四 下午11:25写道：
Hi,
I would like to start a vote for adding the N-Ary Stream Operator in
Flink
as discussed in the discussion thread [1].
This vote will be opened at least until Wednesday, January 15th 8:00
UTC.
Piotrek
[1]
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
<
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Add-N-Ary-Stream-Operator-td11341.html
--
Benchao Li
School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking
University
Tel:+86-15650713730
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
--
Best, Jingsong Lee
--
Nico Kruber | Solutions Architect
Follow us @VervericaData Ververica
--
Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference
Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
--
Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
--
Ververica GmbH
Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung Jason, Ji
(Tony) Cheng
