+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ismael, > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official > docker image in this case? > > Yes, that's the goal. We still want to publish official DockerHub images > for every Flink release. > Since we're mainly migrating the docker-flink/docker-flink repo to > apache/flink-docker, this should just work as before. > > Less important images (playgrounds, demos) would be published via ASF Infra > under the Apache DockerHub user [1]. > > Best, > Fabian > > [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache > > Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 06:12 Uhr schrieb Hequn Cheng < > chenghe...@gmail.com > >: > > > +1 > > > > Even though I prefer to contribute the Dockerfiles into the Flink main > > repo, > > but I think a dedicate repo is also a good idea. > > > > Thanks a lot for driving this! @Ufuk Celebi > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:02 PM Peter Huang <huangzhenqiu0...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:54 PM Yang Wang <danrtsey...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Yang > > > > > > > > Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> 于2020年1月30日周四 上午12:53写道： > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Rong > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was > > > mostly > > > > > > done by Patrick, all kudos to him. > > > > > > Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an > > > official > > > > > > docker image in this case? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Ismaël > > > > > > > > > > > > ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future > > target. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske < > fhue...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang < > > > > myas...@live.com > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36 > > > > > > > > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>; patr...@ververica.com < > > > > > > > > patr...@ververica.com> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication > > into > > > > > Flink > > > > > > > > release process > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas < > > > > patr...@ververica.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi < > u...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and > > scripts > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the > Flink > > > > > project. > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the > > reasoning > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker > > > > > > > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker > > > > > > > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to > > update > > > > > > > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide > > specific > > > > > > > comments) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the > > > earliest > > > > > on: > > > > > > > > > January > > > > > > > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ufuk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release > Plan" > > as > > > > > > > mentioned > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you > consider > > > > this a > > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > category. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
