Hi Kurt, This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail client.
Best, Wei [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html <http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38895.html> > 在 2020年3月17日，10:57，Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread. > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best, >> Jincheng >> >> >> >> Wei Zhong <weizhong0...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道： >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and >>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2]. >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by >>> 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes. >>> >>> Best, >>> Wei >>> >>> [1] >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-106%3A+Support+Python+UDF+in+SQL+Function+DDL >>> [2] >>> >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38107.html >>> >>> >>
